Posted on 03/25/2005 7:55:28 PM PST by West Coast Conservative
Hours after a judge ordered that Terri Schiavo was not to be removed from her hospice, a team of state agents were en route to seize her and have her feeding tube reinserted -- but they stopped short when local police told them they would enforce the judge's order, The Herald has learned.
Agents of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement told police in Pinellas Park, the small town where Schiavo lies at Hospice Woodside, on Thursday that they were on the way to take her to a hospital to resume her feeding.
For a brief period, local police, who have officers at the hospice to keep protesters out, prepared for what sources called ``a showdown.''
In the end, the squad from the FDLE and the Department of Children & Families backed down, apparently concerned about confronting local police outside the hospice.
''We told them that unless they had the judge with them when they came, they were not going to get in,'' said a source with the local police.
''The FDLE called to say they were en route to the scene,'' said an official with the city police who requested anonymity. ``When the sheriff's department and our department told them they could not enforce their order, they backed off.''
The incident,known only to a few and related to The Herald by three different sources involved in Thursday's events, underscores the intense emotion and murky legal terrain that the Schiavo case has created. It also shows that agencies answering directly to Gov. Jeb Bush had planned to use a wrinkle in Florida law that would have allowed them to legally get around the judge's order. The exception in the law allows public agencies to freeze a judge's order whenever an agency appeals it.
(Excerpt) Read more at miami.com ...
Perhaps one that lets the judiciary know in no uncertain terms that the people have had enough of their tyranny and are not going to take it any more. I'm not saying that I'm in favor of violent conflict, but if we back up and redraw our line in the sand every time they impose their will upon us instead of defending the one already drawn, proving time and time again that we are never actually going to stand up and fight them no matter how outrageous their demands become, then what makes you think they will avoid pressing even furthur? What is their deterrent?
That's about as useful as putting an out of control child in "time out" and threatening to spank his butt, when he knows good and well you're never going to do it. A spanking may not be the first, or preferred, line of defense in dealing with unruly children, but it certainly needs to be a tool in the arsenal and they need to know that sometimes it will be used. Once their attention is recaptured, they will become more receptive to less drastic measures, but as long as their escalating tantrums are being rewarded they will remain in control.
We seem to keep forgetting that our freedom was purchased with blood, not words.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of tyrants and patriots." (Thomas Jefferson)
Good points. It's a close call whether an armed confrontation would be better than the horrible spectacle that is happening now. I just prefer avoiding armed conflict and then responding by taking down Greer and a few other judges, and then fixing the laws.
Of course not, you fool. SHE'S DEAD!!! IF you'd check out your facts, you'd have know that!
know = known
It's nice to see that there are some who get it.
"I believe that Judge Greer should be arrested for interference with law enforcement."
I agree.
Plus, that's a REALLY disgusting thing to say.!
OK, she's dead. But that's not the sort of thing that would stop that particular crowd.
BTW, we need a URL on that particular death.
Aren't you forgetting that God Greer ordered immendiate cremation? I mean, once a judge has spoken, it's gospel, right? < /sarcasm >
There was his wrath at the money changers, and then there was the tree that didn't bear fruit.
Jesus is definitely going to cut you guys off.
They're in a 3-way race with California and Massachusetts to see which one can nullify the Constitution first.
That is not the case here. I mean, they aren't usually given an address, for good reason, but by law, DCFS MUST norify parents that their children have been taken into foster care, and why, AND be able to justify it to a judge withing 72 hours.
Agreed God's rule will come but not by our hands.
Apples and oranges. Jeb Bush would be trying to save the life of an innocent, disabled woman; conversely, Elian Gonzales' life was being destroyed by Bill Clinton, by sending him back to a Communist dictatorship and a country steeped in poverty and civil oppression. But I give Clinton some credit, at least he had the ba!!s to do it.
that's real mature
He definitely was,when Terri was moved there and stayed on during part of this case but then resigned.I understand that Greer's wife was on the board at one time also.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.