As we noted last month, editorials and columns in the New York Times were particularly aggressive in asserting that a crime had occurred and demanding an investigation. The Times did a turnabout, declaring on Feb. 26 that there is a "real possibility that the disclosure of Ms. Plame's identity . . . may not have violated any law."
This is a hoot!
I've never thought that so-called journalists deserved an elite statuts regarding this issue. Now they're reduced to saying no crime was committed in order to protect their sources. Too funny.