So if she is unable to process pain and discomfort, then in her present state of existence before the feeding tube was withdrawn, she was not suffering.
Which begs the question, then how can they say they are withdrawing her feeding tube to "end her suffering" when she can't "suffer" in the first place.
the claim that she's "suffering" is used quite freely by her husband and his lawyer. They speak of her as if she's elderly and in advanced stages of cancer. And the MSM-believing public digests their crap.
Prayers for Terri and her family. It's looking like that's all we can give them.