Judical Robes
Posted on 03/25/2005 11:32:07 AM PST by WBurgVACon
The judge who tried the Terri Schiavo case and most recently rejected Gov. Jeb Bush's request to intervene, received a campaign contribution from the lawyer pressing for the brain-injured woman's death, raising questions of a conflict of interest.
According to Florida's Department of State, Pinellas County Circuit Court Judge George W. Greer received a contribution of $250 for his 2004 re-election campaign from Felos & Felos, the law firm of George Felos.
Felos, known as a "right-to-die" advocate, represents Terri Schiavo's estranged husband, Michael Schiavo, who won a court order from Greer to have the woman's life-sustaining feeding tube removed one week ago.
The contribution's apparent conflict of interest was raised by an Internet site investigating the Schiavo case, the Empire Journal, and by Rev. D. James Kennedy's group Renew America.
The contribution from Felos came May 7, 2004, one day after Pinellas County Circuit Court Judge Douglas Baird ruled "Terri's Law" unconstitutional. The Florida Legislature's measure was designed to enable Gov. Bush to intervene in the previous instance in which Terri Schiavo's feeding tube was removed.
The contribution from Felos was the only one made that day, indicating it was not part of a fund-raising effort.
The Empire Journal also reported contributions to Greer were made by three other lawyers who represented Michael Schiavo at various stages in the case.
Deborah Bushnell, Gwyneth Stanley and Stephen G. Nilsson each contributed at least $250 to Greer's re-election campaign, as did court-appointed attorneys representing the husband's interest, Pacarek & Herman and Richard Pearse.
WND attempted to reach the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission, the independent body that investigates complaints against state judges, but there was no response.
Felos' office in Dunedin, Fla., also could not be reached.
The Empire Journal notes that in Florida, a judge is not required to recuse himself if he receives a contribution from an attorney in a case over which he presides.
Nevertheless, a contribution can establish the appearance of impropriety, and the state's code of judicial conduct requires a judge to remove himself in such a case.
Ronald D. Rotunda, professor of law at George Mason University, told the Empire Journal he sees such contributions as problematic.
He cites a 2002 poll of the American Bar Association concluding 84 percent of all Americans are concerned that the impartiality of judges is compromised by their need to raise campaign contributions.
Rotunda said judicial campaign contributions constitute or appear to constitute a tacit quid pro quo in which the judge favors or tilts towards the contributor-litigant.
And yet some who call themselves American think this is what the rule of law means. They say 'due process was followed!'
There WILL be a reckoning.
Ditto.
I believe Terri should live... but I can't understand this hatred towards anyone who disagrees.
Seriously, do people really believe that a judge was swayed by $250?
I hate to say this, but he would win in a landslide.
This makes a lot of sense, but then why draw such attention to yourself....why not throw in a ruling favorable to Terri once in a while to deflect suspicion?
I do think this is somehow about money for the pro-death players in this saga. Proving it in time to do something is almost impossible at this point.
just like Kerry?
Sorry, I did search before I posted it....
He got 65% in his last election primarily running on his decision in the Schiavo case.
$250 doesn't seem like a big sum, though Greer is a lowly county probate judge, I suppose. The fact that Greer's wife is, or was, on the hospice board is a much more serious conflict of interest, if true.
You're OK. I'm not one of the poster police. ;)
I think World Net Daily may have gotten the idea to write this article from FR.
I think that was done. I saw a timeline earlier where a guardian other than Shiavo was appointed. He lasted a brief time and it was returned to Shiavo. According to the table above, that may have all been part of a planned charade.
It's already happening now, but it will get exponentially worse. We'll need to come up with a stronger term than "moonbat."
How dare you apply logic to this issue. you are totally out of step with the majority on these threads! ;>)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.