Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Air Force receives last F-16
F-16.net ^ | March 25, 2005 | Susan Ferns

Posted on 03/25/2005 11:19:32 AM PST by klpt

The US Air Force has received the last of 2,231 F-16 fighters manufactured for the service, the Air Force's Aeronautical Systems Center announced on Thursday.

The general who was the F-16 System Program Office director at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, when the contract for the aircraft was awarded delivered the Air Force's last F-16 Fighting Falcon on March 18.

While Lockheed Martin Aero, Fort Worth, will continue to produce F-16s for international coalition partners, this aircraft is the last of 2,231 F-16s produced for the Air Force, officials said. The first delivery was in 1978.

Brig. Gen. Jeff Riemer, now the director of operations at the Air Force Materiel Command headquarters here, flew the jet from the Lockheed Martin plant in Fort Worth to Shaw Air Force Base, S.C.

"It seemed fitting for General Riemer to make this historic flight, and we were pleased that he was able to accept the invitation," said Col. Scott Jansson, Aeronautical Systems Center Fighter Attack Systems Wing's F-16 Systems Group commander.

For his part, General Riemer said that having flown the very first F-16B while stationed at Edwards AFB, Calif., he is delighted to have had the opportunity to fly the last F-16 produced for the Air Force.

"(This F-16) is not your father's F-16," said Dan Mahrer, F-16 production program manager. "Originally designed as a lightweight, daytime interceptor, the F-16 Fighting Falcon has been transformed over the last 20 years into a multi-role, all weather, air-to-air and air-to-ground attack weapon system.

"Today's F-16 has significant combat capabilities. This (version of the) jet has a new computer, multifunctional color displays, an advanced (Identification Friend or Foe) interrogator, upgraded data link system and a new helmet with an automatic target-cueing system. It has been upgraded with the latest software and cutting-edge precision weapons," Mr. Mahrer said.

"Although this is the last new F-16 expected to be produced for the (Air Force), the F-16 Systems Group continues to technically transform the existing fleet of more than 1,300 jets, enabling evolutionary weapons delivery capabilities through 2025 and making possible a smooth transition to the F-35, the world's premier multi-role fighter of the future," Col. Jansson said.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: f16; lockheed; miltech; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 03/25/2005 11:19:34 AM PST by klpt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: klpt; RedBloodedAmerican

Whew! No more lawn darts!!


2 posted on 03/25/2005 11:26:19 AM PST by Tennessee_Bob (This tagline is Bush's fault.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: klpt
2,231 F-16 fighters manufactured for the service, ...existing fleet of more than 1,300

They've lost 900 planes over the last 25 years?

3 posted on 03/25/2005 12:12:00 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob

You want lawn darts?

Try these: http://www.missilesandfirecontrol.com/our_products/firesupport.html


4 posted on 03/25/2005 12:14:43 PM PST by rustyncrusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
They've lost 900 planes over the last 25 years?

Lost, sold and retired.

5 posted on 03/25/2005 12:15:44 PM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Deadcheck the embeds first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
No, probably went to the bone yard at David Monthan AFB.

They can be brought back to duty if needed.
6 posted on 03/25/2005 12:18:10 PM PST by demlosers (Soylent Green is made in Florida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
They've lost 900 planes over the last 25 years?

Military aircraft are expected to wear out, and there are always accidents.

7 posted on 03/25/2005 12:39:06 PM PST by Tom Bombadil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Well - yeah - but I'd hate to be the guy to have to fly the functional check flight on one of those. It would take a long while to bring them back to ready status.


8 posted on 03/25/2005 12:41:39 PM PST by Tennessee_Bob (This tagline is Bush's fault.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rustyncrusty

Wonder if I can get those on surplus??


9 posted on 03/25/2005 12:42:47 PM PST by Tennessee_Bob (This tagline is Bush's fault.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: klpt
I worked for General Dynamics - Ft. Worth (Now Lockheed - Martin) right out of college. I worked for the Low Observables Dept which analyzed and measured RADAR signatures of aircrafts and individualy components. The F-16 was a great aircraft very sleek and elegant.

One ironic point. This must have been around 1982. Our office complex shared the same hangar where they performed final testing and preparation for aircraft that was being delivered to foreign nations. There were several F-16s that were being modified because we had sold them to Iran but because of the government turnover, I guess they had been held in cold storage since the late 70s until things got resolved. Well, that never happened, so they canceled the contract and were preparing them (new paint job, decalls ... etc) for of all places Israel. How's that for irony?

I still think the B-2 is the coolest looking aircraft I've seen.
10 posted on 03/25/2005 12:53:47 PM PST by tang-soo (Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob

When they came out with them, did you ever think you'd see the "last one"?


11 posted on 03/25/2005 1:11:31 PM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

F-35 search:
Google

12 posted on 03/25/2005 1:14:26 PM PST by SunkenCiv (last updated my FreeRepublic profile on Sunday, March 13, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob
Whew! No more lawn darts!!

Lawn dart? If you want an aircraft that looked like a lawn dart, the F-104 takes that prize--the wings were so small and so thin it looked wingless.


13 posted on 03/25/2005 1:28:12 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (John Kerry--three fake Purple Hearts. George Bush--one real heart of gold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: klpt
Shall we see upgrades of F-16 even the last F-16s are distributed? I would like to see F-16XL with canards and systems of F-16AFTI someday to maximize its capacity.
14 posted on 03/25/2005 1:42:13 PM PST by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rustyncrusty

Will all of those fit on a Cessna??


15 posted on 03/25/2005 2:17:03 PM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tang-soo
I still think the B-2 is the coolest looking aircraft I've seen.

My vote is for the B-70 Valkyrie

16 posted on 03/25/2005 2:17:54 PM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888

Make that German lawn darts...


17 posted on 03/25/2005 2:19:45 PM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
Yea, the word "awesome" should be reserved by law/proclamation to be used ONLY in one way--describing just two aircraft:

The XB-70 and the SR-71.


18 posted on 03/25/2005 2:37:02 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (John Kerry--three fake Purple Hearts. George Bush--one real heart of gold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
The F-104 was truly a lawn-dart. Back in '62 at Moron AB Spain, there was a squadron of ANG or Reserve F-104's that were activated for the Berlin Wall (IIRC) crisis. Seems to me they lost around 12-13 airplanes in the year or so they were in Spain.

I witnessed two personally. Both were engine failures, one on takeoff, and the other in a two-seater on his downwind just prior to touchdown.

As a comm center specialist, I remember sending many crash reports, and they nearly always were result of engine failure or flameout.

They were beautiful to watch when all worked properly! I still remember the howl of the engine as they throttled up, and the eerie moaning sound they made on a slow pass over the base.

19 posted on 03/25/2005 2:39:06 PM PST by Don Carlos (Me cache en los Moros. (Ancient Spanish curse))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Don Carlos

Don,

I believe the F-104 used the J-79 engine, the same engine that would later power the F-4 Phantom II.

I wonder of the unique roar you heard would have been similar hearing an F-4 (which had two J-79s--the F-104 was, of course, a single engine J-79).

Also, I wonder if many members here know that the F-104 was actually a Kelly Johnson Skunkswork project, which would go on to produce the SR-71, F-117 et al. The F-104 was the original "Black Project" Skunksworks project, probably occurring around the same time as the Skunksworks' U-2.

The original push for th F-104 dates way back to the Korean War. Although prototype testing took longer than expected and the war had ended, that would have been a major (make that quantum leap) advancement over the F-86 Sabre in the Korean War.

Damn, would that have been great to see the F-104 go up agains tthe Mig-15s.

Another interesting point--the Italians may still be flying the most advanced F-104 version, the F-104S. If not, they were retired very recently. That is one hell of a long history for any fighter.


20 posted on 03/25/2005 2:59:45 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (John Kerry--three fake Purple Hearts. George Bush--one real heart of gold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson