Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmishDude
I saw Ken Ono give a talk on this. It's a very interesting result and excellent work, but I don't think worthy of a writeup in this magazine -- and such a bad one at that. They're not really telling what this means in any real sense.

How many folks are smart enough to understand these things, but aren't out there doing research themselves instead of writing about someone else's for low-circulation science magazines? My guess is, not many. Always part of the problem in science reporting: the folks smart enough to report on these topics well are either researching or (if they haven't got great financial ambitions) teaching (or both).

81 posted on 03/25/2005 9:36:44 AM PST by No Longer Free State (The last thing Reuters wants is a free and unfettered Iraqi press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: No Longer Free State

No, science can be reported to a general audience because most scientists aren't very . . . what's the word . . . bright. Mathematics can't. And when they try, you get an effort like this.


85 posted on 03/25/2005 9:39:19 AM PST by AmishDude (The Clown Prince-in-a-can of Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson