Replies

Michael Schiavo is not saint. He is trying to get rid of his "wife" so he can continue on with his girlfriend and the children he fathered with her while Terri was in a hospital bed.

If he cared about his "wife" he would simply divorce her and let her parents take care of her, something they have begged him for. But he refuses.

Michael Schiavo insists on starving her to death and even subjecting her parents to strip searches to make sure that they are not sneaking water or food to Terri. They have gone years at a time without being able to see Terri because Michael has prevented them from doing so.

As far as the Christian aspect is concerned, Jesus said to get the spec out of our eyes IN ORDER THAT that we could see clearly when we judged others.

Good looking family, btw.

Regards,

: )

I'm certainly not arguing for M. Schiavo, or what he is doing. My only point has been that this case has followed the law as it is currently written. I know that we allow people who are on life support (and the medical community does consider artificial nutrition and hydration life support; not my definition), to be "unhooked". What I can't believe is that if we are going to allow life support to be removed, that we would not allow a more humane end other than making the person starve to death. Can't understand it.

Thanks for the compliment. My children are wonderful.