"Get consistent!"
I'll grant you this: your arguments are consistently wrong.
"Do you propose the President violate laws to attain a goal. Sorry old chap, but that is not the way it works in a free society."
Well, old chump, that is exactly what the founding fathers did when they signed the Declaration of Independence, and exactly what Eisenhower and Kennedy did when they sent the troops in to end Jim Crow and school segregation.
What you so blindly refer to as "a goal" is in reality the most fundamental principle of society: the protection of innocent life.
Further, it is Judge Greer and the other black-robed moral lepers that have upheld him who are in violation of the law. Using the power of the executive to rein them in violates the law in no way.
"here is seemingly NO LEGAL way to that end."
Road apples. Greer's ruling is no more valid than those of the 1950s courts that acquitted the guilty of murder in civil rights cases, and no more constitutional than laws barring Negroes from public accomodations.
"I just bet you pissed and moaned"
Did you have to study to become that supercilious, arrogant, and obnoxious, or is it a reaction to too many atomic wedgies from the popular kids at school?
"when klinton/el reno use shock troops to grab the Cuban boy. Now you call for the same here?"
Any reasonable person sees, as you do not, that there is a difference between pushing a little old lady into the path of a speeding bus, and pushing a little old lady out of the path of a speeding bus.
Klintstone and the rugmuncher general used their power to do an evil thing. I call for the Bushes to use their power to do a good thing. What sort of purblind wrongheadedness sees those things as morally equivalent?
I suggest you put your money where your mouth is. Grab whatever you feel you need and storm the care facility yourself. Prove to all of us just how much you can back your beliefs. If you are correct, God will back you and make you safe.
I expect the contrary!
Or did you just find the hat, cowboy?