Posted on 03/25/2005 12:34:02 AM PST by ambrose
Quote: The Terri Pitchfork Brigades are doing an awesome job making themselves look like lunatics all on their own.
Saw a woman on CNN who was rolling on the ground saying something about praying to get the devil out of the judges. Looked like she was in a epiletic fit. Not good for the religious people in this country.
To me a feeding tube is a machine but the issue reamins one of being allowed to do die if you wish to.
If there were paperwork to that effect, I would be 100% for letting her die. It's the lack of paperwork that turns this into a quagmire. I don't doubt that if she had the choice she would die rather than go through this.
Write your paperwork up no matter your position on the issue.
There is no need to get loopie over the matter - this poor fella was loopie.
Maybe not as impulsive as this; The "No Justice, No Peace" slogan still needs a modern upgrade for current use. The same perceived slavery to dictators exists.
I prefer the unarmed human wave approach.
A feeding tube is just that, essentially a length of plastic hose. It is no more "life support machinery," than an insulin syringe for a diabetic. The notions of viability is and independance are spurious. If the argument is that Terri cannot feed herself the very same can be said for a three year old...with out parents, the kid will, in all likelihood, starve to death...
Indeed, your diet at present is also dependent on machines and the labor of others. If it weren't for your refrigerator, the truck that hauls produce to the grocery store, the machine that packages your hotdogs, etc., you would have to completely and radically alter your diet and the amount of time you required to feed yourself. The whole *viability* argument is spurious.
If there existed paperwork signed by her asking for these actions to not be taken would it be okay to disconnect her?
To me that is the only reason for any disagreement on this topic. With that paperwork she should 100% be allowed to pass. Without it, it becomes much cloudier, and despite my feelings that there is no way that she would want to live like that, I'd vote for keeping her alive.
Part 2:
If there was no money alloted to pay for this, should the taxpayers be held as responsible? It would seem to me to be in contrast to the way most here think medical treatment and payment should be handled.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.