Posted on 03/25/2005 12:34:02 AM PST by ambrose
Is that correct?
Now why would you think 'that is correct', when I explicitly said "I don't condone violence"?
No one here is pro death. We don't want Terri to die, but we are accepting reality.
I asked you to provide links, because I knew you couldn't do it.
That's exactly what I expected from you.
But maybe I read you wrong, if so I apologize.
Well now here we come to the critical point, shorn of confusion about autonomic life support. They should have just been let go. It is this decision to let some one die a painful death when only food, water and primary care are required that is the nub of the case.
LOL!!
Its insanity. They get nuttier by the day. I had planned to go to the Rally in April till they included Schiavvo in the mix.
I am against Judges making law, but these Judges are following the law and taking massive heat for it.
Aha. This is probably best reposted here.
Governor Jeb Bush, jeb.bush@myflorida.com
Friday, March 25, 2005
The court, in 1997 when Michael announced he was'engaged' should have immediately conducted a guardianship hearing and transfered Terri to State guardianship. Because of this failure, we are in the present situation.
Questions you might consider:
(1) Why did Michael choose to 'ignore' her wishes for nearly 7 years until 1997 when he announced he was'engaged' to Jodi Centonze and 'suddenly' remembered the conversation about life support with Terri from years before?
Michael Schiavo answer would probably rationalize that it took that long before he realized there was 'no hope for recovery...'
(2) However, the 1992 malpractice suit for $20 million was based on the premise/conclusion that Terri would NOT recover and she would require constant medical care for the remainder of her life estimated by Michael Shiavo and his laywers to be 51 years(which is the normal life expectancey)...Where were her WISHES at that time?
(3) The court, in 1997 when Michael announced he was'engaged' should have immediately conducted a guardianship hearing and transfered Terri to State guardianship, at a minimum because of the obvious conflict of interest on the part of Michael Shiavo.
The court system failed to act at that point, and that is a major factor on why we are at the point we are today.
Guardianship, by law and practice, is determined to be given to that person who is most heavily 'biased' in favor of the disabled person. Under most conditions this would be the spouse. However, most prudent courts, if during the guardianship period, the appointed guardian by circumstances or accident tilts the 'bias' away from the interest of the person so guarded, would conduct and immediate review, and at a minimum, transfer guardianship to the appropriate State agency.
hope this is useful
Van & Katherine Jenerette
North Myrtle Beach, SC
Professor, Political Science, SCC
Associate, Sociology, Coastal Carolina University, South Carolina
Truth666?
He's a resident of Illinois, he can't buy a gun in Florida. (Unless he has it shipped to a Licensed Firearms dealer in Illinois.)
"Okay... what's his screen name??"
ROFLMBO
BTT
well then...I think his punishment should be starvation and no water. Judges will definitely agree.
"Yeah, we know you collect every story that makes the save Terri crowd look bad."
And only the Terri crowd can make the Terri crowd look "bad."
Good intentions gone bad. It happens.
(Crickets)
The Terri Pitchfork Brigades are doing an awesome job making themselves look like lunatics all on their own.
No justice, no peace.
Peter tried something like this, albeit with a sword.
It was the wrong idea then, too.
Quote: Trying to steal a gun, had people using their kids and even a bomb threat. I expect more of the same to co
Kinda reminds me of the old palestinine men who send in the their children as suicide bombers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.