Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eccentric
If Terri had WANTED life support DIScontinued, she could have signed a Living Will. What was she suppose to sign to say she WANTED to be fed?

Excuse me? Please read my post again. Removing nutrition and water was ILLEGAL before 1999. Terri could not and would not have asked for such a thing. And if your post is about my leaving out food, starvation is not what's killing her, dehydration is.

3,261 posted on 03/26/2005 10:45:22 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (Life support. canned, frozen or fresh, it's good for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3216 | View Replies ]


To: DJ MacWoW

I thought eccentric was questioning the government's default view of a person's wishes. It's only sensible that life be the default, but in Terri's case the government is defaulting to death.


3,266 posted on 03/26/2005 10:47:37 AM PST by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3261 | View Replies ]

To: DJ MacWoW

Removing nutrition and water was ILLEGAL before 1999.

Please correct me if I am wrong but it seems that no other than Feces was responsible for getting it passed in Florida that tube feedings were life support along with Sen King (R)


3,268 posted on 03/26/2005 10:48:25 AM PST by fiesti (Terri deserves life---Terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3261 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson