Yes, I do see what you mean.
He was charged with malicious obedience. He would accept EXACTLY what his supervisor told him to do, and obey it to the letter. The problem was that the supervisor was not being precise with his orders, and the net result of this employee's obedience was harmful to the company. Thus, malicious obedience.
Sounds like a fitting term for the judiciary in this case, in "obeying the law."
Malicious obedience.