Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Willie Green; Alamo-Girl; GOP_1900AD
The USTR who negotiated CAFTA was not concerned with such matters, not even when they involved sustaining the U.S. defense industrial base. When the House Armed Services Committee proposed reforms to bolster the domestic production of critical weapons technology for the American armed forces in the 2004 Defense Authorization Act, USTR Robert Zoellick objected. He hates any "buy America" language, even when national security was at stake. Yet, the WTO GPA allows "the protection of essential security interests relating to the procurement of arms, ammunition or war materials, or to procurement indispensable for national security or for national defense purposes." It is an odd thing indeed when the WTO shows more concern for national interests than does the USTR.

Indeed. One would think that the Xlintonian...Thomas Barnett was President...

5 posted on 03/24/2005 2:54:29 PM PST by Paul Ross ("Nothing that is morally wrong can be politically right." -William Gladstone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Paul Ross

Thanks for the ping!


6 posted on 03/25/2005 9:08:30 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson