Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tallguy
Wasn't there some talk about trying to do a naval version of the F-15, which still has a nominal production availability to plug the gap here? The swing-wing F-22 Naval version (which Cheney was probably assuming would replace the F-14) got killed by Xlinton in 1993.

Meanwhile, time marches on, and not only do we have the evolving cruise missile threats, but an ongoing improvement in world fighter aviation, Su-30MK's and possibly the Mig 35 (the "ATFski").


61 posted on 03/24/2005 1:10:15 PM PST by Paul Ross ("Nothing that is morally wrong can be politically right." -William Gladstone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Paul Ross
Wasn't there some talk about trying to do a naval version of the F-15, which still has a nominal production availability to plug the gap here?

Hadn't heard that. It takes a lot to design a carrier fighter. The last time the Navy & Air Force attempted to combine on a fighter project was McNamara's TFX Project (the F-111). Even then the naval version, the F-111B, was significantly different from the Air Force's 'A' Model. Part commonality was very low and the Navy couldn't get the performance that they needed.

During the Carter Administration there was talk of making a naval version of the F-16. The Navy got the Hornet (2 engines) instead.

62 posted on 03/24/2005 1:19:19 PM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson