Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NoClones
Yeah, an early version of it lost the Light Weight Fighter competition in the Air Force to the F-16 (It was known as the YF-17 at that time). It was modernized and modified for Navy use as the F/A-18 (the Navy liked the beefier structure and two engines compared to the F-16).

The F/A-18 does it's job well as a light fighter/attack plane, and replaced the F-4 in the Navy and Marine Corps as such. But its was never, ever intended to replace the F-14 in the fleet defense role...it is out of it's league in that role!

43 posted on 03/24/2005 11:55:56 AM PST by Sting 11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Sting 11
But its was never, ever intended to replace the F-14 in the fleet defense role...it is out of it's league in that role!

Indeed, we need to call Dick Cheney on the carpet for his allowing the F-14 titanium wing-box tooling to be destroyed back in '91 when he was SecDef.

We should have fired up production of updated versions of the F-14. How long can we keep the old war-horses flying?

44 posted on 03/24/2005 12:09:19 PM PST by Paul Ross ("Nothing that is morally wrong can be politically right." -William Gladstone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson