[Stu Cohen]

Four years of Kerry because I wanted to send a message is not something I am willing to risk or pallette. Bush is far from perfect, but beats the hell out of anything the Democrats have been putting up.

Well, if you aren't willing to sacrifice, they you will ensure that the system continues as-is in perpetuity. Somewhat cowardly, IMHO ... but do what you think is right.

And if Kerry happened to win, dare I say you would notice very little that is different right now. Maybe a few things here and there, but for the most part - your life would continue as it has for the last 4 years or so.

Let's not go nuts. The two major parties have few practical differences. Currently, we just vote in the people who take the bribes. Elected officials don't make laws. Lobbyists do.

[speed_addiction]

And if Kerry happened to win, dare I say you would notice very little that is different right now. Maybe a few things here and there, but for the most part - your life would continue as it has for the last 4 years or so.

We are being a bit myopic here. While I do not support how Bush is mishandling this issue, I do feel that a Kerry Presidency would have been disasterous.

What would be the state of the War on Terror? What would be the state of the economy with the tax cuts that would have quickly come about under Kerry. The entire Middle East would be in a state of jihad.

I am not willing to toss the baby out with the bathwater over one issue I may disagree with the President on.

[Travis McGee]

RINO or Rat? We have the choice of the frog in the pot: simmer until boiling at a lower temperature, or go right to full boil.

The end result is the same. If the frog doesn't figure it out and hop out in time, he's dead.