Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luis Gonzalez
You have opposing sides saying what Terri wanted, both highly biased.

In the absence of knowing what Terri wants, I am saying she should be allowed to live, you are saying she should be killed. The bias you suggest is perverse.

So you condone Judicial activism.

No. Those words were uttered by Richard Nixon to Pat Buchanan, when he was talking about bombing Communists and Congress wanted to stop him. The judiciary in this case in the person of Judge Greer, is actually defying good practice and principle, rewriting the law as it were - including Greer not recusing himself although his biases in the case are known and telling the state government it should not obey the law in terms of taking Terri into custody.

Ivan

960 posted on 03/24/2005 11:16:40 AM PST by MadIvan (One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 958 | View Replies ]


To: MadIvan
"I am saying"

When were you given a voice in this private matter?

963 posted on 03/24/2005 11:18:36 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 960 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
"No."

When the Courts threw out the Texas sodomy laws, they acted under that principle of acting on how they "felt" about a law.

That was judicial activism, and it is exactly what you described.

965 posted on 03/24/2005 11:20:07 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 960 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson