Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmericanInTokyo
Accordingly denial of the Holy Eucharist to this young woman via feeding tube, would be an infringement upon her free exercise of religious expression, a violation of her Constitutional rights?

In past years she has already been denied this, and she will be again. She doesn't have the rights of a beaten, starved dog. And where is the National Organization of Women in this? Right, I know, already preoccupied with helping Juanita Broderick.

This is sickening beyond belief, but the judiciary has shown us what is important and who is boss.

387 posted on 03/24/2005 8:18:25 AM PST by spudsmaki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies ]


To: spudsmaki

It was my understanding that THIS time, Michael did allow Last Rites to be performed just before the feeding tube was removed. IIRC, it was the last time it was removed that the blocked the Priest from entering her room and performing Rites.


567 posted on 03/24/2005 8:42:01 AM PST by sweet_diane ("Will I dance for you Jesus? Or in awe of You be still? I can only imagine..I can only imagine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson