So a controlling adulterous spouse (who the wife was planning to divorce before her sudden brain injury) - who along with his attorney (and that attorney's hospice?) have a financial interest in her death, receives the court's backing to euthanize his wife.
Despite a disputed medical diagnosis of PVS and that (tainted) spouse's hearsay (provided only after the wife was awarded a large medical malpractice settlement for rehab therapy) that the wife did not want to live "in that condition".
Where is the political party that loves to jump on
"suspicious timing?" Ah well...
What "condition" did Terry envision at age 26 when she expressed her "last wishes" to her soon-to-be ex spouse? The condition of being able to recognize and smile at her mother?
And the courts have given her helpless body over to Schiavo and Felos despite the loving parents being willing to undertake the cost and care of their daughter.
Father, Father....
We have crossed the Rubicon. There's no looking back because the battle is in front of us now...