Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar
The operative word is charity, which means that it enjoys tax advantages. If the charity was created as the veneer for Imus to enjoy a lavish vacation home, then as a taxpayer, I care.

Those were my thoughts. He is doing good with the ranch but coincidently this ranch might offer all kinds of tax advantages. This makes his motivations cloudy. The tax advantages?

Who owns the ranch? My guess is the charity does and gets some great tax breaks and that the charity is obligated to sell the ranch to Imus 10 years from now for one dollar. Or that Imus's son inherits the ranch via a one dollar sale when Imus dies

92 posted on 03/24/2005 7:32:33 AM PST by dennisw ("What is Man that thou art mindful of him")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: dennisw

He is doing good with the ranch but coincidently this ranch might offer all kinds of tax advantages. This makes his motivations cloudy. The tax advantages?

So freaking what? Charitable contributions are tax deductible. Ever wonder why? To encourage people to donate to charities, that's why. Home mortgage interest is tax deductible. Why? To encourage home ownership.

Bill Gates caught hell because he didn't donate enough. Now Imus' motivations are 'cloudy' because 'this ranch might offer all kinds of tax advantages.' Geez, since government is such an efficient money manager, maybe we ought to send them all of our freaking money. /s

119 posted on 03/24/2005 4:37:20 PM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson