Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: leadpenny
He won't have to sue. The WSJ reporter and whoever authorized the article have been made to look petty and foolish. Imus is winning this one in the court of public opinion - although not on FR, where so many just don't get it.

He won't sue, becasue he has NO CASE. I don't think the reporter has been made to look foolish at all. All I have seen is the goons on Imus calling him names like "schmuck", "little bitch", and Imus whining the WSJ deliberately wrote the article to punish him about his speaking out about vaccines.

Imus has lost it.

157 posted on 03/25/2005 7:02:05 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: finnman69

Lost what?

Look, I wouldn't try to change your mind about Imus. It's adult entertainment.

If you don't believe Imus is doing good charity work - take your money elsewhere.


159 posted on 03/25/2005 7:05:42 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson