To: laredo44
No it doesn't.
Or was the humor?
In case it wasn't:
Two species to form another ONE. The two did not form THREE. The first two pre-existed. They formed another ONE.
64 posted on
03/24/2005 2:04:38 AM PST by
MacDorcha
("Do you want the e-mail copy or the fax?" "Just the fax, ma'am.")
To: MacDorcha
Sounded to me like you were discussing how a "new" species might come into existence. An individual from species A "combined" with an individual from species B to form an individual of a new species, C. At the end of the day, you have three species, not two.
65 posted on
03/24/2005 2:22:18 AM PST by
laredo44
(Liberty is not the problem)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson