"Personally, I am partial to the idea of intelligent design, but this is a matter of faith, not science and therefore does not belong in a science class."
"Personally, I am partial to the idea of (evolution), but this is a matter of faith, not science and therefore does not belong in a science class."
Now, does that sentence still fit? It does to me. Beliefe in "nothing" causing different lifeforms takes the same faith as believing in "something" causing different lifeforms.
Hmmm.... I think I see your point.
First evo to take the time to try to explain it.
Of course, considering you are an IDest, wuoldn't venture into it being TO big a suprise. After all, we're both reasonable here.
Sound arguement, but I still hold that evolution (as gravity) needs to be a sidenote (as does ID) in basic science classes.
In biology, anthropology, physics, astro-physics classes... fire away! That's the focus of those classes.