I am glad you think it was better this time than the other appeals.
On another thread, somebody said Steve Centani from Fox News was holding up a copy of the appeal and referring to obvious errors in it, saying it looked hastily put together and flawed. He was not talking about the merits of the case, as I took it, but the written appeal.
Did not see it myself, and am not doubting your impression, anyhow.
But no one has any faith in the institution of the Supreme Court or the justices, for that matter. Now some have said that they have to admit jurisdiction this time around, because the new law gives it to the Federal Courts. That might be, but I have no faith in them.
Just as I lost any I had when the other courts refused to give the trial de novo that the new law mandated. They all used Greer's old trial record and said the Schindlers failed to show they would prevail in a new trial. Even the 11th circuit voted 10 to 2 for that, in effect, by refusing to hear.
So at this point, I trust not a one of them.
I agree....if they deny...I don't see how with all the claims in it that point to a conspiracy...if not they have to open an investigation
I agree with you on not trusting the courts at all.
And, unfortunately, the appeal is full of typos. But when a woman's life is slipping away by the hour and previous appeals have failed, there probably was no time to clean it up. I think in terms of legal arguments it does well.