The question again is why? I know it's hard but put yourself in the shoes of someone who supports what Greer decided? What is your motive? Where is your decency? You wouldn't do this to a hardened criminal. If you err with an innocent, and especially helpless person, you err on the side of life, don't you? Aren't we all better off with her sustaining life, despite her unfortunate state? Who are we to say she finds life miserable? She may derive some worthwhile sensory pleasures out of the most mundane things that you and I take for granted. We just don't know. So, why torture this poor woman to death in an unprecented act of cruelty, in my view?
On MSNBC, They said earlier that it is only a matter of "poliical calculus" causing Ms. Schiavo's life to be debated.I then saw footage of her smiling when people spoke to her and touched her gently. She is not dead and to kill her will simply open the doors to killing the weak and the meek.
The right to die people are dangerous because they know they never err.
Thinking that one may be wrong,implies a moral code.
People who will fight to the end to starve an innocent helpless woman have no moral code. Therefore these people cannot hear us no matter how we shout:"This is wrong" their internal make up cannot receive that message.