[Time4Atlas2Shrug]

"If one can get the protective services to enter at this time they must have had something to pursue this long ago."

I agree, and perhaps it was a grave error not to persue that.

I would have no issue with her tube being removed if there was evidence that she wanted that, but there is a dispute. I guess I just think it is much better to give her parents a shot at her care if there is doubt.

Take care.

[windchime]

Regarding pursuit of Schiavo complaints:

http://www.theempirejournal.com/56092_FDLE_agent_implicates_mccab.htm

[Former Military Chick]

Hell that would have been so much easier. Why he doesn't is beyond me. He is not going to come into any landfall of cash once she passes away. He had been offered a huge tidy sum to divorce her and allow her parents to take charge of her care. This at least to my husband puts her husband in somewhat of a favorable light.

I honestly do not know why they chose that avenue. A man whom I seldom have anything nice thing to say about him, I think it is Boys (gore lawyer from his election) who said there were better arguments to support their case and wondered why they did not pursue them. I guess hind sight is 20/20.

Thanks again for your enlighten comments on the thread.