[Wallace T.]

You still have not presented anything other than the liberal talking points. When confronted with contradictory evidence, all you can counter with is name calling. Most conservatives regard the liberal liars in the media with the same credibility as the Weekly World News. However, you appear to accept the liberal party line without question. Please note that this is a CONSERVATIVE Web site. I advise that you review the comments on the front page of FR for your edification.

[Logos124]

Wallace all you do is accuse those who disagree with you of being liberals or trolls. Can't you allow for the chance that someone may trust the decision of over 20 judges, and 15 years of appeals? You need to understand that you are not the authority on what is consevitive and what is a liberal talking point. So many of your arguments are weakened by the fact that you come off as so very arrogant. Try and get over yourself enough to understand that this is not as clear-cut a case as you want it to be.

I do not claim to be 100% correct on this issue, thats why I'm up at 12:38 discussing it. Rather than insulting people why don't you try and convinve them you are correct.

[Jimmyclyde]

You still have not presented anything other than the liberal talking points. When confronted with contradictory evidence, all you can counter with is name calling. Most conservatives regard the liberal liars in the media with the same credibility as the Weekly World News. However, you appear to accept the liberal party line without question. Please note that this is a CONSERVATIVE Web site. I advise that you review the comments on the front page of FR for your edification.

I've been here since 2002 I know what kind of website it is.

With that said your Paranoia is getting to you my friend.

You do wear tin foil hats don't you?