A judge cannot order the executive branch not to execute a law that gives that branch express authority to act, where the law itself has not been found unconstitutional.
If he can, we live in a tyranny and I want no part of it.
Good post. Those thoughts crossed my mind.
Depends what you mean "execute" a law. You mean write one? The legislative branch does that. The fact that an executive branch cannot write its own law is not "tyranny." Or do you mean act in accordance to existing law?
bttt