Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shermy

That's a very likely explanation for the low attendance. It's becoming more clear there is not going to be a high-profile Bush administration official frog-marched off to jail and no impeachment of Bush over Plame.

~smirk~


14 posted on 03/23/2005 2:43:02 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper; okie01

The message was sent via NYTimes article a month back saying, hey, maybe this investigation is not such a good idea after all.

Then deflecting to whether or not Novak testified. As far as I can tell that doesn't matter since the officials who told him already testified, according to one source.

I can't figure out the Judith Miller angle, but the fact she didn't write anything is doesn't make a leak of a CIA agent's name to her right.


16 posted on 03/23/2005 2:50:10 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: cyncooper

Novak gave them a warning that the first one at least was not "a partisan gunslinger."


18 posted on 03/23/2005 2:52:08 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson