How do you know we DON'T know the truth? Are we going to know it when we hear it? Who gets to determine what the truth is? The judge thinks after presiding over this case and having all the evidence presented that he has the truth. Do you see where I'm going with this?
What's the harm in keeping her alive? If they say that she won't suffer during the starvation, then she isn't suffering with the feeding tube. Before they put criminals to death, first, they must be found guilty beyond reasonable doubt, then go through endless appeals. Why is that? Because there is the possibility that there was a mistake in the legal process. Now with Terri, it's double-edged. Not only is her life in the hands of medical "experts", but legal "experts" as well. That only compounds the possibility that somewhere, there was a mistake.