Skip to comments.
Mother arrested for attempting to intervene in her 14-year old's decision to have abortion
The Illinois Leader ^
| Tuesday, March 22, 2005
| Joyce Morrison, Southern IL News Correspondent
Posted on 03/23/2005 10:01:06 AM PST by stylin_geek
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 441-443 next last
To: stylin_geek
It seems every year around this time Satan's minions are busier then usual.
21
posted on
03/23/2005 10:07:12 AM PST
by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians)
To: TXBubba
To: stylin_geek; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...
To: stylin_geek
In a nation that had a sliver of a chance for survival, there would be arrests for murder, rape and kidnapping, but not for a mother trying to protect her baby and grandbay.
Stick a fork in us.
To: All
Take a good look everyone. Our nation is disintegrating before your very eyes.
25
posted on
03/23/2005 10:07:54 AM PST
by
Rutles4Ever
(Warning: may eat own)
To: stylin_geek
This is the perfect case to squash the Democrats with. Let them come out and defend the abortion clinic, etc....Most parents will not go for this. I hope this gets alot of play on tv and radio. It needs to.
26
posted on
03/23/2005 10:07:58 AM PST
by
yellowdoghunter
(Children need two-parent homes, hopefully the ones who actually made them.)
To: stylin_geek
It sounds like this minor girl was kidnapped by a person who was not her lawful guardian.
To: stylin_geek
I am shocked and appalled! Considering I had to sign 3 forms in order for my 17 year old son to be able to get an allergy shot without my presence, one would think a 14 year old would need parental permission for an ABORTION! Insane!
28
posted on
03/23/2005 10:08:07 AM PST
by
PilloryHillary
(Can vegetarians eat animal crackers?)
To: stylin_geek
Chilling...the school is as fault, the kidnapper is at fault, the statutory rapist is at fault, the police are at fault, even the daughter is at fault, but the mom gets arrested. Hang on, it's going to get interesting.
29
posted on
03/23/2005 10:08:56 AM PST
by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
To: stylin_geek
Un.......f**king...........believable.
This isn't the country I thought I lived in.
To: stylin_geek
She took a seat near the main desk and said, I was told I could not prove my daughter was there so I began calling her name. A medical tech at the clinic told me , Its your daughters rights, its her body. You have no rights.I see. The guy who got her pregnant could be charged with statutory rap, but the doctor can penetrate her and perform invasive surgery and not incur any criminal liability.
Makes sense to me.
31
posted on
03/23/2005 10:09:04 AM PST
by
Maceman
(Too nuanced for a bumper sticker)
To: stylin_geek
What right does the the other Mother have to take the girl for an abortion. She is not her legal guardian!! Does she not need the permission of the legal guardian to take the girl for an abortion??
To: SmithL
This is so very wrong.They would have had to arrest me for more than tresspassing or making noise.
To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
In other news, there are now laws on the books that prevent you from getting your CAT declawed!
TRULY unbelievable!
34
posted on
03/23/2005 10:09:31 AM PST
by
RushCrush
(Hitler was a gun-banning, abortion-supporting, business-regulating, Christmas-hating, vegetarian.)
To: stylin_geek
What I find the most horrendous are the adults working is such clinics, saying those things, and behaving that way.
To: stylin_geek
Woe be the persons or clinic who dare perform a medical procedure on my children before they are 18.
36
posted on
03/23/2005 10:09:45 AM PST
by
DTogo
(U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
To: RushCrush
Hey, ear piercing could conceivably harm the child, whereas abortion is a perfectly safe medical procedure that merely removes an "unviable tissue mass."
37
posted on
03/23/2005 10:09:50 AM PST
by
stylin_geek
(Liberalism: comparable to a chicken with its head cut off, but with more spastic motions)
To: Rutles4Ever
At the very least, parental interference.
I can't believe the school didn't check her ID.
38
posted on
03/23/2005 10:09:50 AM PST
by
Not A Snowbird
(Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Pajama Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
To: madprof98
My friend, liberals have held these things are a "private matter." No one may interfere with a killing. The mother intruded on her daughter's privacy. That's why she was arrested. According to this logic, the police did the right thing. Just as they are in the right to arrest you for aiding a dying person a judge wants killed.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
39
posted on
03/23/2005 10:09:59 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: OXENinFLA
UN F'N REAL!!!
yes it is.
Thanks for the ping
40
posted on
03/23/2005 10:10:05 AM PST
by
firewalk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 441-443 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson