Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas Deb
BTW, her "loving" husband had a girlfriend a little over a year after Terri's incident that left her in the state she is in. So much for the long-suffering, devoted, caring, compassionate husband myth. Seems Michael loves to control Terri with his marital contract, but feels no obligation to honor the vows made in that contract.

So he should have remained celibate for the 14(?) years that his wifes cerebral cortex has been destroyed?

Would you have felt better if he had stopped by every couple days and just ....(I'll just stop there)

84 posted on 03/23/2005 12:12:21 PM PST by vikzilla (I don't want to be a part of your life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: vikzilla

No, he should have divorced her and gone on with his life - I would have no problem with that.

But to stayed married simply to control her while not abiding by his marital vows makes a mockery of the marriage. He wants all the rights that come with being a spouse, but he doesn't feel enough respect and love for her to abide by the marital vows. And I am not just talking about adultery, as he has not allowed Terri to have the rehabilitation that might could help her.

I wish he would divorce her and go on with his life and let Terri remain in the care of those who really have loved and cared for her from the beginning.


87 posted on 03/23/2005 12:19:53 PM PST by Texas Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson