To: Peach
"And have you seen freepers who think we should accept the word of some guy who "claims" to be a doctor on the internet who ..."
Yes, who is it that is accepting her "husband's" word that her wishes would be to die? Shouldn't the will of the patient be paramont? Yet, her "husband" only remembered this conversation he supposed had with his wife 6 or 7 years after her "illness".
Don't slam one side for blindly accepting a "doctor's" word, when the other side (you?) blindly accept a biased source about Terri's wishes.
What is Michael's motivation? Love for Terri? I don't think so. He's not even allowing the comfort of water for her dry cracking lips as she dies. He's motivation is entirely self-centered, possibly even for sinister reasons.
Don't slam the FReepers who are clamoring for Terri's rescue.
The Overriding question to all of this is what is Terri's wishes. Unfortunately, we'll probably never know. Since her "husband" has blocked any and all therapy, there's no chance for improvement, barring a miracle from God.
To: Texas2step
Why don't you read post #339.
342 posted on
03/23/2005 4:32:24 PM PST by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson