To: justshutupandtakeit
There is no "bad Law" involved here just people unhappy with the result of the legal system doing its job properly.
Very reminscent of the thinking of Liberals.
If you never have been unhappy with the Court in the last 50 years, you belong at DU, not here. So don't try to raise your pro-death view to a principle that the court system worked properly. The court worked properly in your view only because you agree with it. And the court ALWAYS works properly in its view - because the court defines what "properly" is and no one can question it.
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
I certainly have not "pro-death" view you are confusing that with an Anti-pretend-this-is-life view. There is a huge difference.
In general I am against the majority of the Court's rulings when they are just concocted out of thin air. That is not what has happened here where every ruling has had clear precedence for it. It is no accident that EVERY judge from every political persuasion has come to the same conclusion for years now on this case.
There is simply NO way society can spend millions per year per patient maintained this semblence of life. It is impossible no matter what YOU or I might desire.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson