Next time you are in the store ask them what they heard from Carla Iyers, the nurse.
Probablyu nothing since what would she know. Her testimony not mentioned in the "news". here affidavit not read.
But freind, she is the one that nursed her, day in, day out for some time. Don't you think her opinion would matter? The court doesn't. The "news" doesn't. And so you freinds haven't heard of her, have they?
Have you? http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player.html?032205/pol_schiavonurse_032205&FOX_Friends&FOX%20News%20Exclusive&acc&Politics&-1&wvx-300
she was on CNN too.
http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder0903.pdf
Is the new standard on Free Republic that we are to take the word of someone who has been found NOT CREDIBLE by the courts. SOmeone who was never subjected to cross examination?
But we are to completely ignore the words of those who were subjected to cross examination and testified under oath and were FOUND TO BE CREDIBLE.
Is that the new standard? Because if it is, just tell me. I want to make sure I stay up on the new rules and all.
BTW, you did know didn't you that nurse was fired in 1996 because she claimed another nurse was killing patients?
"Her testimony not mentioned in the "news". here affidavit not read."
Dan Rather believes her though........I'm sure.