I agree. I can't imagine who would want to go on "living" the way she is.
It's always Florida. :(
Please do not project your wishes into this. This is not about you. A woman is being murdered by her abusive husband and has been denied therapy for which he won a hefty settlement. Read the Florida statute that describes what PVS is and she clearly has been misdiagnosed by the court-appointed euthanasia activist neurologist - a great impartial choice. His diagnosis was predetermined.
What other cases is such flimsy evidence of what a spouse said to another admissible and all other testimonies dismissed? I hope you are happy that she will no longer have to live the way you wouldn't want to live. You'll get to celebrate fairly soon along with her loving husband.
So, unless you are upright, walking, and talking, running and jumping, eating solid food and drinking a coke, you have a life not worth living?
You know, I'm really sick of *DISRUPTORS* like you gloating over Terri's suffering. Either you support *COLD-BLOODED MURDER* or you support *LIFE*. It's really that *SIMPLE*.
You should *ASK* yourself this question: If you were in Terri's *SHOES*, would you want *PRESIDENT BUSH* deciding whether you live or die, or would you prefer to have *THE CLINTONS* deciding for you? It's really that *SIMPLE*.
If you're on the *WRONG* side of this issue, you really don't deserve to call yourself a *CHRISTIAN*.
You would prefer that the death date of each of us were determined by a panel who also look at the productivity ability of our lives?
Once you start to kill, you continue to kill. Just who do you think all of these people will be killing next? One day it will get down to you.