But what are the "instructions"?
If it is remanded to the district court, wouldn't there have to be re-insertion of hydration and nutrition?
Or why remand it at all?
I'm not a lawyer. just a lay person making assumptions. My assumption is these are what is filed as a motion for the judge to sign.
Ok...on the 18th of March, an injunction was filed to the fed dist court on behalf of Terri, to stop the removal of the tube...this was before the jurisdiction was given by congress....so I am thinking what is posted on the 11th in the filings is the ruling on THAT...it is not on what they are deciding today. Sit tight and pray while you do.