Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NCLaw441
Best I can tell, the court found that Whittemore ruled incorrectly, his denial of the injunction was wrong, and the 11th circuit sent it back to him to reconsider, perhaps with instructions to GRANT the injunction. You can't tell from just the description, but this was all I could get to.

Saw you posted this on the other thread.....hope what you think is right!

26 posted on 03/22/2005 7:01:54 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: nicmarlo

Here is the portion of the document listing I found:
Judgment of the district court is Vacated and Remanded with instructions; Application for COA Granted In Part & Denied As Moot In Part; Motion for Injunction Denied Without Prejudice; Mandate issued immediately. (EEC/FMH/CRW)


32 posted on 03/22/2005 7:02:59 PM PST by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: nicmarlo

If death by starvation and dehydration is so kind, why is it not used for criminals and pound animals?


39 posted on 03/22/2005 7:03:52 PM PST by Rodentking (http://www.airpower.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: nicmarlo

nicmarlo,

Where are you getting your info? There's still nothing on FOX.


172 posted on 03/22/2005 7:27:10 PM PST by freecopper01 (" The amount of people who are making fun of a blueprint for genocide is an alarming thing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson