Replies

I have made multiple complaints about Cranford throughout this thing. If he had been even close to the only one with that diagnosis, it would have been a complete outrage. But the judges were faced with all her other doctors, 2 at that trial, agreeing with him.

On the Schindler side, was a radiologist, who couldn't even distinguish between PVS and Coma, and the National Enquirer Advertising, Quackwatch listed, Nobel Lying Hammesfahr - who equivocated about those things as well as his observations of Terri at trial.

To expect the judges to have found the last 2 more credible than all the others is irrational.

Re Hammesfahr's nomination:
(notice it is a nomination for a "Nobel Peace Prize in Medicine" and that there is no such thing.)

The reason being a Nobel Prize nominee is such an honor is *because* it is so very rare, due to the very tough guidelines about who nominates and how many.
It is the highest standard of Peer Review. Politicians are not peers in the sciences, so they can only nominate for Peace - that is their area.

Hammesfahr fraudulently tries to pass himself off as someone who deserves that rare level of honor. His only true claim to "peer review" is a complete joke, as he has it listed on his page (link on my page) - something like 3-4 local Floridians he shares patient referrals with, one or 2 of them not even doctors.
He outright lies about her heart condition and her neck "injury" all the time. Quotes showing how on my page.