Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Neets; Howlin

This is just flat out stupid.


43 posted on 03/22/2005 4:22:19 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Dog

What's stupid about it?


49 posted on 03/22/2005 4:23:44 PM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Dog

Well, this IS what is coming. Count on it. Among other things.


54 posted on 03/22/2005 4:24:15 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Dog

Stupid, but predicted.


55 posted on 03/22/2005 4:25:14 PM PST by Neets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Dog
This is just flat out stupid.

It sure does the job of distracting attention from the core legal issue of the Schiavo case, which is to get to the bottom of the patient's wishes. Our spouses can't make us take or refuse medical treatment on their say so. And in a case where somebody is incapacitated, the question regarding stopping food and water is answered by trying to discern the patient's wishes, not their spouses wishes.

It could be that an unfaithful spouse actually has good (maybe even the best) evidence regarding the patient's wishes.

140 posted on 03/22/2005 5:20:53 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson