Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: layman
This is not an effort to regulate what is sent. This is simply an effort to afford the ability of subscribers to choose to opt out of this particular subject matter. As far as the search engines are concerned, there is no doubt in my mind that they can figure out a way to do it.

Opt Out?
It's called McAfee, and you need it anyway.
If you are too cheap for that, sign up through one of the providers that gives it to you free.

The last thing we need is State Laws to try to regulate an International Business. We can have 50 different State Laws, plus a Federal Law and Two Hundred odd more laws in other countries. Why not just have the State opt out of the Internet and be done with it?

SO9

35 posted on 03/22/2005 5:06:56 PM PST by Servant of the 9 (Trust Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Servant of the 9
Why not just have the State opt out of the Internet and be done with it?

The internet is a wonderful tool. I favor keeping it that way. Unfortunately there is a place for government in the scheme of things, and this is one of them. All societies have standards of decency. Radio, the second mass media after newspapers, has them. Television, the third, has them. The internet, the fourth, needs them too.

37 posted on 03/22/2005 5:25:29 PM PST by layman (Card Carrying Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson