[apackof2]

Huh?

[stylin_geek]

Okay, I'm getting punchy, I thought it said "Pet Porn" bill.

[Servant of the 9]

Spokesman Tammy Kikuchi said Monday that Gov. Huntsman "doesn't have a concern about the constitutional challenge."

Typical politician.
Only cares about looking good at the moment.

So9

[Moral Hazard]

I don't get it. If the government creates a registry of bad sites, why can't the consumer get the list from the government and block those sites directly? Why involve the ISP at all?

[RadioAstronomer]

Any content provider that the Utah attorney general claims hosts material that's harmful to minors must rate it or face third-degree felony charges.

You could pretty much kill the internet with this. Pretty much anything could be "deemed harmful" (including political blogs) if it was ruled that way.

[Redcloak]

The controversial legislation will create an official list of Web sites with publicly available material deemed "harmful to minors."

They already have those on the Internet; though they usually do nothing more than spawn a blizzard of pop-up ads!

I just hope that they don't call the official list something like www.jonshotpornolinks.com.

[Billthedrill]

So that's what they wanted a copy of my bookmarks for!

[The Great RJ]

I suppose there will be some state bureaucracy to determine what sites are porn and what aren't. What a job that would be.

[SteveMcKing]

What if your content isn't offensive, but you put it on the list anyway for spite sake?

[numberonepal]

The dumbest law ever. Didn't they notice that it was struck down in PA. Not to mention that it's impossible to implement. 50000 new porn sites a day throughout the world. Another 50K are removed. And probably like a million or so have alternating DNS schedules. Dumb, dumb, dumb.