To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
| Science Ping! |
An elite subset of the Evolution list. |
| See list's description in my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail to be added/dropped. |
|
|
|
2 posted on
03/22/2005 3:41:17 PM PST by
PatrickHenry
(<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
To: PatrickHenry
So I can now refer to my mini maglite as a relativity violator? COOL!
4 posted on
03/22/2005 3:43:59 PM PST by
zygoat
To: PatrickHenry
Will later read tonight. :-)
To: PatrickHenry
A better title would seem to be "Light may arise from relativity aberrations" or maybe "Light may arise from relativity exceptions" or perhaps "Light may arise from relativity distortions"..
Whatever the means by which light arises it cannot be a 'violation' of something which doesn't exist, even if it were recently thought to exist. That assumes the experiments bear out this theory.
21 posted on
03/22/2005 4:24:36 PM PST by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: PatrickHenry
24 posted on
03/22/2005 4:53:10 PM PST by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: PatrickHenry
A little light reading, huh?
26 posted on
03/22/2005 5:02:53 PM PST by
Junior
(FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
To: PatrickHenry
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson