[carolinablonde]

"They should given her a lethal injection, once they decided that she must die because Michael wants her to.

this is a joke, right? maybe a gas chamber would have been more efficient?"

I agree with Tomahawk. Wouldn't it be more "humane" to give her a lethal injection instead of starving her? After all, if we starved the worst mass murderer on death row for as long as 2 weeks, every lawyer in the ACLU would be apoplectic.

[tomahawk]

We don't kill dogs or cats like this. They get a shot.

We treat them better than Terry is being treated, depriving her of water and food.

This is absolutely barbaric and I'm disgusted to be a citizen of a country that does this to people.

[Asphalt]

But don't you see? Those are human beings, that lady is a retarted good for nothing waste of space, plus, she is costing us money that could be spent on more important things. /sarcasm

Makes a heck of a lot of sense doesn't it.

[AmericanInTokyo]

Sheesh, even an injured dog on the side of the street wouldn't be given this painful treatment of starvation to death, denial of food and water, and blocking those who would bring even just water.

Now I don't recommend cruelty to animals, but somebody might think about bringing a parakeet or rabbit in a cage to that site, and stay there 24/7, and publicly deny it food, even if for a week or more, and wait how long until the local Florida Humane Department comes over and breaks it up and feeds the animal, causing a ruckus. Then, news reporters could film that and the American people could be shown the amazing contrast.

The animal outside gets food/water and police protection; the HUMAN BEING a few yards inside the "hospice", doesn't.

[the invisib1e hand]

that's a little like saying, "in the long run, we're all dead."

very bad, dead, lifeless logic.