To: Asphalt
It is barbaric to murder Terry this way.
They should given her a lethal injection, once they decided that she must die because Michael wants her to.
4 posted on
03/22/2005 1:23:06 PM PST by
tomahawk
To: tomahawk
They should given her a lethal injection, once they decided that she must die because Michael wants her to.this is a joke, right? maybe a gas chamber would have been more efficient?
6 posted on
03/22/2005 1:24:03 PM PST by
the invisib1e hand
("remember, from ashes you came, to ashes you will return.")
To: tomahawk
But cutting her throat would be murder.
Right?
28 posted on
03/22/2005 1:28:34 PM PST by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: tomahawk
39 posted on
03/22/2005 1:30:46 PM PST by
expatguy
(http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
To: tomahawk
My wife and I said the same thing this morning.
To: tomahawk
Put her out in the parking lot and take turns driving over her.
269 posted on
03/22/2005 2:30:18 PM PST by
Old Professer
(As darkness is the absence of light, evil is the absence of good; innocence is blind.)
To: tomahawk
That's what I would like to ask those in favor of "letting her die." Would they support giving her a lethal injection? And if not, why not?
To: tomahawk
They should given her a lethal injection, once they decided that she must die because Michael wants her to.The liberals that want her to die don't see it that way. I understand your thinking. The liberals want her dead, but only by slow starvation. It is a legal nuance. It just would not be right to have a direct hand in her death.
434 posted on
03/22/2005 11:03:07 PM PST by
BJungNan
(GoGov.com - Make it your home page for a week!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson