This case has been hashed out and every court comes to the same conclusion - right or wrong, it's her husband's decision. They can't or won't look into whether he's morally the appropriate person to make the decision, whether he's moved on or has ulterior motives. Legally, it's his decision, and that's that.
That's what's driving Freepers nuts - this is one of those times they want the courts to be activist and not follow the law.
