I have no idea. But why do you take the word of Michael Schiavo over them? The inconsistencies and questionable motives here far exceed "reasonable doubt," especially when we're talking about killing someone. Not "letting them die," as in disconnecting a ventilator, but intervening with the intent to kill a woman.
There maybe some connection either by relation or lack of soul. It is scary the more information the comes out regarding this case, the more we should be aware of people like Peach.
Because I find it easier to take the word of someone who has been questioned under oath several times vs. someone who has never been subjected to cross examination and who clearly never spoke to the parents about all this. I find that incredible.
Because in his effort to care for Terri, he became a rehab specialist. And for a dozen other reasons you've probably already seen me post.
This article is illuminating in how the Schindlers spoke so well of Michael, until money entered the picture. And if they had suspicions that something happened to her, why did they wait for 12 years to raise them? And if you're going to say it's because they never saw her bone scan and he hid documents from them, I have links that prove that is not the case.
http://www.sptimes.com/2003/11/23/Tampabay/Schiavo_clash_is_root.shtml