Posted on 03/22/2005 9:23:36 AM PST by Pharmboy
NAZI's, the only socialist 'right-wing' party ever....
What was the name of that party again?
Libertarian National Socialist Green party
Yeah, sure, it's a right-wing party.
Not only that, but this bunch had "Green" in their name as well. Literal eco-Nazis...
LEFT-WING Ideology. Why can't they understand this? Government control of lives, totalitarian, authoritarian...
What is Right-wing about that?
Lets's see...
Green Party, right wing?
Socialist, right wing?
Libertarian, right wing? A little.
Nationalist, right wing? I'll claim patriotism rather than nationalism.
Poor reporting.
Ding! Ding! Ding! Ask any American what Nazism was about and 95% will say anti-semitism and racism. Little do they know about the whole malthusian, eugenics, purify the earth, vegetarianism, environmentalist stuff that made a lot of normal people go along with it. There's a great book called "The Nazi War On Cancer" that talks about this stuff. The Green Party is very much the modern day Nazi Party.
He is a socialist in the style of Stalin, Mao, ... and Hitler... all socialists.
As has been said of the Austians, their two greatest achievements were convincing the world that 1) Hitler was German and 2) Beethoven was Austrian.
When this came up before, someone added: The greatest accomplishment of the left has been convincing the world that the Nazis were rightwingers.
Definitely the most bizarre story I have read today.
Robert Proctor presents a great deal of evidence that the nazis' exerted massive control over most facets of ordinary citizen's lives. Yet somehow, he never reaches the obvious conclusion that such compulsive regulations,even if arguably well intentioned,ultimately lead to a large scale sacrifice of basic freedoms.
He explains how the nazis greatly restricted tobacco advertising, banned smoking in most public buildings, increasingly restricted and regulated tobacco farmers growing abilities, and engaged in a sophisticated anti-smoking public relations campaign. (Suing tobacco companies for announced consequences was a stunt that mysteriously eluded Hitler's thugs.) Despite the frightening parallels to the current war on tobacco, Mr. Proctor never even hints at the analogy. Curiously, he seems to take an approach that such alleged concern for public health shows nazism to be a more complex dogma than commonly presumed. While nothing present in the book betokens even a trace of sympathy for the Third Reich, this viewpoint seems incredibly naive. It's easy to wonder if Hitler and company were truly concerned with promoting public health. The unquenchable lust for absolute control is a far more believable motive.
Incongruously some of the book's desultory details lend further certitude to its unpromulgated thesis. Hitler not only abstained from tobacco; he also never drank and was,for the most part--a vegetarian. Frighteningly he also was an animal rights activist. The book reruns a nazi-era cartoon depicting many liberated lab animals giving the nazi salute to Hermann Goring after he outlawed animal experimentation and promised to send violators to a concentration camp. Also included is a fitting quote -now too widely suppressed from Joseph Goebbles, `the fuhrer is deeply religious, though completely anti-Christian; he views Christianity as a symptom of decay." Controversial as it may be in some circles, such a quote proves that nazism viewed Christianity as hatefully as it did Judaism. Passing coverage is given to the Third Reich's forays into euthanasia and eugenics. Another striking morsel is the reporting of a widespread nazi-era whispered joke `What is the ideal German? Blond like Hitler. Slim like Goring. Masculine like Goebbles...' implying that Gautlier Goebble's homosexuality was common knowledge. Nazi linguistic restrictions seem to be the counterpart of modern day `hate speech.' Words such as `catastrophe,' sabotage,' and `assassination' were to be avoided, and in a portentous move, `cripple' was replaced by `handicapped. Proctor also suggests `the word `enlightenment' (was) probably used more in the nazi period than at any other time.'
Perhaps the ultimate overlooked point of this work is the suggestion that Adolph Hitler with his anti-tobacco, anti-religion, pro-animal rights, pro-government intrusion would find success as a modern day liberal.
Thanks--good post.
"Libertarian National Socialist Green party"
Can't get much more LEFT WING than that.
The paper's bias is obvious.
It does show one thing......liberals have very oppressive visions.
The liberal who wrote the report just wanted to find someway to blast the right wing. Even if it means making the reporter look stupid.
But deep down inside of the reporter and the reporter's liberal pals...........they quite possibly have the same eilitist/oppressing vision that the shooter had.
Would explain a lot of anti American/anti Liberty statements that a lot of democrats make.
Ok, this kid was a wild-eyed socialist Nazi and he is tagged with a right wing label.
The same leftist Nazis are trying to kill an useless eater in Florida.
Right Wing? Sounds like every whining leftist rant I've ever heard.
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!
Well, that's not a political party I ever expected to exist.....
Words no longer have meaning.
I think I am ready for the Lord Jesus to come back! The socialist left democrats are slowly but surely corroding our planet with their leftist agenda!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.