To: Terriergal
You trust the publick screwels to present the process of scientific analysis correctly? I taught Biology (in the publick screwels .. thanks for the rushbo) for 7 years. I am a conservative. Yes, I did present the process of scientific analysis. I also taught evolution as a theory. I also taught create-ism as a theory.
What I really abhor about this subject is the way it polarizes people. An open mind never hurt anyone.
85 posted on
03/22/2005 9:14:04 AM PST by
SCALEMAN
(Super Cards/Rams Fan)
To: SCALEMAN
I taught Biology (in the publick screwels .. thanks for the rushbo) for 7 years. I am a conservative. Yes, I did present the process of scientific analysis. I also taught evolution as a theory. I also taught create-ism as a theory.How did you teach create-ism as a theory? It has no such scientific status, because it makes no predictions and no observation can ever falsify it. Or were you just using the word theory to mean "wild-assed guess" in which case it applies to create-ism but not to evolution.
95 posted on
03/22/2005 9:36:39 AM PST by
Thatcherite
(Conservative and Biblical Literalist are not synonymous)
To: SCALEMAN
Give us the scientific definition of "theory."
109 posted on
03/22/2005 9:53:44 AM PST by
Junior
(FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
To: SCALEMAN
I also taught create-ism as a theory.
What does this theory predict? How can it be tested? What hypothetical observation would falsify this theory?
205 posted on
03/22/2005 12:28:44 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson