What I mean to say is that the theory is in a state of constant change based on evidence that comes and goes. To believe it ALL supports evolution when much of it is contradictory (based on known theories) or in flux (subject to revised interpretations) is an exercise in faith and not science.
What I mean to say is that the theory is in a state of constant change based on evidence that comes and goes. All natural science theories are in that state, and probably always will be. The theory of gravity is much touted as the paradigmatic example of an irrefutable science fact, and it is presently bears the scars of some big pending question marks.